Thoughts 17
Why do film companies feel obliged to put children in their films for no other reason but engage younger fans. Why would parents let there children fight ghosts, dinosaurs and other threats. They always come up with some cliched roundabout response boiling down to "eh."
And why do so many horror films feature little kids as the devil's incarnate or some force of obscene evil. Once was fine with the exorcist, but after that, it has just become an epidemic. I get it, children are meant to be innocent and this harsh juxtaposition exemplifies the unsettling nature of whatever the artistic vision is, but why so much.
Also, Superman better be good, I lack hope however, as the trailer had so much going on. Pacing is an issue today. Just let me sit down and engage with the characters and see them develop beyond the point of "I was weak. I got knocked down. Take a pill of resilience. Montage maybe. Epic fight. Almost get knocked down. Realising family and friends have always been there for you. Realise your power came from within. Win. Then spin off into 8 sequels of increasingly meaningless money-grabbing attempts by media executives.
Creative expression is all that matters. Money was meant to be a coincidental product of that.
If you want to watch a good film, watch The Holdovers, or Taxi Driver, or anything else.
And damn the corporate monopolies, I'm looking at you Meta and Disney. Leave us alone. Stop sucking the magic out of human creative expression and monetising our attention. You bloodsucking leaches. I would order a full-scale coupe if I had the arms, support, funding, legal backing, government support, a louder voice, tactics, and a mindset like Mussolini. I don't however, so just keep waiting.
These tangents are getting out of hand. Bye.
Comments
Post a Comment